Near the town of Hanksville, Utah is a large geologic formation known as
Factory Butte. At the intersection of the road that allows access to the area and the main highway is a signboard erected by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), which administers the area. There are two pieces of paper attached to it. One informs visitors that the Factory Butte area is one of the most scenic and geologically fascinating places on the entire Colorado plateau. The other states that part of the area is an
off highway vehicle (OHV) play area, and asks that OHV riders voluntarily stay on designated OHV trails when outside the “play area”. Upon reading this I imagined someone at the BLM
office saying “This is one of the most beautiful places we have, so let’s open it to OHV
use. Only the BLM could do something this ridiculous.
One look at the place makes it painfully obvious that not many OHV riders have volunteered to follow the trail restrictions. Much of the Factory Butte area, and roadsides all the way to Capitol Reef
National Park, are laced with a spaghetti pattern of deep ruts and tire tracks. The OHVs have destroyed plant life along with much of the scenic beauty that used to exist around Factory Butte. Even the shape of the land is
altered by changed erosion patterns from the deep ruts made by OHV tires. When I first visited Factory Butte fifteen years ago, the place was beautiful and pristine. Since then, much of
it has been trashed by irresponsible OHVs riders.
The BLM administers vast tracts of land in Utah and all across the western states. It is unimaginable that they would deliberately concentrate OHV use in an area they proclaim to be one of the most unique and scenic places
The BLM should ideally eliminate OHV use in this fantastic place, and if necessary, move OHV use to some less unique and less sensitive area. At the very least, OHV use off of designated trails outside the
so-called OHV “play area” should be made strictly illegal, with stiff penalties for violators and more active enforcement by the BLM. During the several days I spent around Factory
Butte I saw a number of OHV riders, but I did not see a single BLM patrol vehicle or BLM officer. The very idea that OHV riders will voluntarily stay on trails in this remote place is ridiculous. One look at the Factory Butte area
is proof that the voluntary system has failed miserably. All of us pay for the irresponsibility of a few with the loss of our most unique public lands.
John Dohrenwend, a retired U.S. Geological Survey geologist and adjunct professor at the University of Arizona, says the OHV-related damage in Factory Butte is very real. His research reveals accelerated levels of erosion on Factory Butte hillsides
from OHV use, and significant damage to the crust of the area's Mancos Shale, which he says could take decades to repair. Dohrenwend fears that continued soil damage in the area will eventually increase salinity levels in the Colorado River system, potentially impacting water quality for riparian areas and downstream users. Commenting on off-roading in the area he said "I can appreciate that it's probably a helluva lot of fun, but the consequences are extreme."
There are several organizations, like the Utah Shared Access Alliance, lobbying hard to completely open Factory Butte and other public
lands to unrestricted cross-country motorized travel. They claim to want public lands open for use by all people. This sounds very inclusive if one forgets that the "use"
they propose destroys the land for any purpose except their own. Unless someone wants to photograph tire tracks, photography is pointless in an area that many of these vehicles have “used”.
Sightseers, hikers, and backpackers certainly do not want to spend time in pulverized, eroded, and dusty terrain while the sounds of OHV engines ring in their ears. So who is it, exactly, that
would want to be in the area along with the ATV and ATC folk? For most of us, "use" of public lands does not mean altering or destroying those lands in a way that takes decades or
longer to heal. Such is not the case with the off-road crowd. If my hobby were driving bulldozers, should I be allowed to do it on the public's land? As ridiculous as this sounds,
the principal is the same.
All-terrain vehicles and dirt bikes destroy the land over which they travel, along with everything that happens to live on it, transforming it into a true wasteland. The land and its
inhabitants can cope with a few of these vehicles on infrequent occasions, but when large numbers of them constantly use an area, that area essentially becomes one huge tire track. Still, groups like Utah Shared Access Alliance want
people to be able to ride these things
totally unrestricted on public lands. They realize that by "using" public land in this way they take it over as their own. Others no longer go to these places, because by most
standards it is simply unpleasant to be there.
These single-interest lobbying groups also conveniently forget that every American citizen, including curmudgeons in Ohio and old ladies in New York City,
own these federal lands and support them with tax dollars. Do the majority of these people want to fund the conversion of pristine lands in America to ATV playgrounds?
I don't think so. Of course ATV folk are citizens too, so perhaps they should get some land to wreck. The point is that it need not be the most unspoiled and spectacular land we have.
If you believe the propaganda distributed by the OHV people, anyone who does not care to have vehicles that sound like chainsaws marauding over every square inch of the landscape is an "environmental
extremist". Those who want to take over the public's land as their own, turn it into a lifeless wasteland, and plunder the scenery causing erosion, pollution, and noise in the process, are not extremists. I guess it's all a matter of
perspective. Regardless, they are smart enough to know they cannot tell the truth and say they want to wreck a place in the name of having fun. That, I think, is the reason they instead preach inclusion of all people, mostly themselves.
“We only want to “use” the land too, along with everyone else. Why are we excluded?” they cry. They are trying to insinuate that their "use" of the land is like walking on a trail or fishing in a river, and that is simply not true.
There are certainly areas that are not geologically unique, environmentally sensitive, or insanely scenic that can be set aside for unrestricted ATV and ATC use. I don't
want to keep these non-extremists from tearing up dirt and having fun, I'd just prefer they don't wreck the best places left in America when they do it. Huge areas in this country have been decimated by strip
mining, for instance. Can’t the off-road crowd “use” those? Their ATVs can't do anything worse than the bulldozers have already done. In places like these they can spin out, do wheelies, and tear up ground until
the tread is worn from their knobby tires, without further destroying anything in the process. It’s something to think about, at least.
OHV: Off Highway Vehicle, includes ATVs, ATCs, and others.
ATV: All Terrain Vehicle, usually a small three or four wheeled vehicle with relatively large knobby tires.
ATC: All Terrain Cycle, essentially motorcycles equipped for off-road use.
BLM Contact Information:
Bureau of Land Management
Henry Mountain Field Station
P.O. Box 99
Hanksville, Utah 84734
Phone: (435) 542-3461
Bureau of Land Management
Cornell Christensen, Manager
Richfield Field Office
150 East 900 North
Richfield, Utah 84701
Phone: (435) 896-1501
Bureau of Land Management
Utah State Office
440 West 200 South, Suite 500
Salt Lake City, Utah 84101
Phone: (801) 539-4001
Fax: (801) 539-4013
Bureau of Land Management
Kathleen Clarke, Director
849 C St NW
Washington, DC 20240